‘Cultivating and nurturing a
culture of inclusion’, has been the vision and mission, of the parish where I
am serving, for the past three years. We
arrived at this statement during the interim period and through deliberate and
focussed discussions, dialogues and assessment of the congregation,
neighbourhood and the city. I am
delighted and humbled to note that we have taken concrete steps to realise this
vision in our own time and through our own efforts.
While we have made significant
progress through the re-configuration of the sanctuary and to being open to learn about human sexuality
and mental health issues, we must not stop or believe that we have arrived,
rather we should remember and live out the words of a traveler on a snowy
evening, ‘I have miles to go before I sleep, I have miles to go before I rest’. This simple yet profound line by Robert Frost
reminds us that our journey with God and his people is without end and whenever
we think we have arrived – God shows us yet another way to reach out to the
world and (in our case) continue to cultivate a culture of inclusion.
As you know, our business
meetings, at the parish, diocesan level and beyond, make decisions by following
a rule of simple majority voting on a resolution. In some cases, like financial reports etc.,
that is the only way to move forward and to give legitimacy to the
reports. However, when it comes to the
doctrinal or missional issues and plans, I believe simple majority does move us
forward but either leave or suppress the voices, conviction and faith of those
who voted against it. As a result, dissenting
voices (both who won and who lost a resolution) can suppress, ridicule and trounce
upon the theology and the faith of the other in order to either malign or
convert to their way of thinking. This
was and continues to be the case in an ongoing debate and saga with regards to
the equal marriage.
This desire to convert and to
malign the other and to walk away from dialogue and conversation, in my
opinion, is a symptom of a much larger problem with our understanding of
‘unity’ of the body of Christ. Unfortunately,
‘uniformity’ has been equated with and presented as the fundamental principle
and foundation of ‘unity’. Uniformity at
all cost has hurt the church more than we would like to know and acknowledge.
The church has never spoken with
a uniformed voice. The Acts of the
Apostles highlights the way early church resolved the issues and disagreements
among the apostles and the disciples.
They resolved it by speaking out and in some cases poaching members from
the other groups but never losing sight of their purpose and mission in the
world. And their purpose and mission in
the world was to preach the Gospel and to live out the commandment of Jesus to
feed the hungry, to clothe the naked and to visit the sick and the prisoners. In other words, diverse voices and opinions
found common ground and vision to be the church in a hurting and unsettled
world.
‘Inclusion’ means that we will include everyone
regardless of our differences and agreements with them and will equip them to
serve God and his people to the best of their abilities. It also implies that our unity is in our
diversity. It also demands listening
ears and discerning hearts so we can learn and sojourn with one another
regardless of our theological positions
Uniformity often presents itself as being of one mind and voice to the outside world. It is easier to comprehend. However, uniformity lacks a depth of spirit which is more present in unity.
ReplyDeleteAs you said above, uniformity stifles the voice which is not in agreement. Unity, a more challenging construct, has, in my opinion, a greater depth of understanding for differing voices.
As you note, the apostles and indeed the present day church as a whole, has much diversity in how to present the gospel. The apostles and the present day church is definitely not uniform. Even members of the same denomination will often disagree. However, different the churches of the Chrristian tradition may be, there is a general unity of purpose - to live and share the gospel of Christ.
Having spent the better part of my life in a uniformed environment, the military, I can appreciate the benefits of both uniformity and unity. In times of crisis or impending crisis, uniformity will have its advantages. Thankfully, we as a church, are not perpetually in a state of crisis and the church can and should recognize the strength of unity through diversity of voices, talents and perspectives.
Jesus said he had not come to abolish the law, but noted that rather than having a codex of the law, Christ would write the law on our heart. Here is an example of unity over uniformity.